{"id":3532,"date":"2010-10-18T21:18:35","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T04:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/?p=3532"},"modified":"2010-10-18T20:08:52","modified_gmt":"2010-10-19T03:08:52","slug":"government-vomit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/?p=3532","title":{"rendered":"You are not my Representative&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"Congressional Staffers Gain From Trading in Stocks \" href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703431604575522434188603198.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703431604575522434188603198.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I heard this on CNBC last week and finally searched for and found the WSJ story tonight . While\u00a0 it does not surprise me in the least, what surprises me a little is that the politicians\/aides don&#8217;t even seem embarrassed by it (at least put on a show of &#8220;oopsie&#8221; when asked.)\u00a0 It&#8217;s more of &#8220;Yeah, so what?&#8221; attitude.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;The aides identified by the Journal say they didn&#8217;t profit by making  trades based on any information gathered in the halls of Congress. Even  if they had done so, it would be legal, <strong>because insider-trading laws  don&#8217;t apply to Congress<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Of course not &#8211; why should laws for the simple folk apply to the government? That would be silly.<em> <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;A few lawmakers proposed a bill that would prevent members and  employees of Congress from trading securities based on nonpublic  information they obtain. <strong>The legislation has languished since 2006.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Congressional staff are often privy  to inside information, and an unscrupulous person could profit off that  knowledge,&#8221; says Vincent Morris, a spokesman for Rep. Louise Slaughter  (D., N.Y.), a leading backer of the &#8220;Stop Trading on Congressional  Knowledge Act,&#8221; or STOCK Act. &#8220;The public should be outraged there is no  law specifically banning this.&#8221; &#8220;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So all the fist-pounding, angry rhetoric by politicians about how evil Wall Street is and how billionaire corporate insiders and hedge fund managers have all the advantages and the little guy investor has no hope since he can&#8217;t get access to same the information is just more BS grandstanding by politicians (shocking I know) since they take advantage of the same type of insider information BUT it&#8217;s not technically illegal for them to do it (because they have made sure not to pass the law) so it&#8217;s OK&#8230;since the current law seems to exclude them.\u00a0 Oh&#8230;OK&#8230;got it. (wth?)<\/p>\n<p>If you work for someone who is voting on a piece of legislation that can effect an entire industry (or certain companies) you have absolutely no business profiting from that information. You cannot possibly tell me you think you aren&#8217;t acting on inside information.<\/p>\n<p>And if you feel you&#8217;ve done nothing wrong, then you and your bosses have absolutely NO business being talking heads about the evils of corporate and Wall Street greed. Spare me.<\/p>\n<p>This is what annoys\/angers me the most. Not the fact that they did it. Most people, if they are being honest with themselves, would if they could&#8230;or at least have to think about it hard. But having to listen to and read all the anti-business crap spewed forth by politicians ever since the banking\/mortgage melt-down (a melt down facilitated in part by politicians but they like to forget that little detail) is beyond ridiculous. And this is simply more evidence of just how deep that BS is up on the Hill.<\/p>\n<p>From Merriam-Webster Dictionary:<\/p>\n<h2>Definition of <em>HYPOCRITE<\/em><\/h2>\n<div>\n<div>1<\/div>\n<div><strong>:<\/strong> a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div>2<\/div>\n<div><strong>:<\/strong> a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703431604575522434188603198.html I heard this on CNBC last week and finally searched for and found the WSJ story tonight . While\u00a0 it does not surprise me in the least, what surprises me a little is that the politicians\/aides don&#8217;t even seem embarrassed by it (at least put on a show of &#8220;oopsie&#8221; when asked.)\u00a0 It&#8217;s more [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[746,249,43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-investing","category-politics","category-rants"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3532","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3532"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3532\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3538,"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3532\/revisions\/3538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a99kitten.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}